Why no mention of Kirk’s faith influence and Floyd’s criminal record

When discussing figures like Kirk and Floyd, it's important to consider the different contexts in which their lives and actions are often analyzed. Kirk's faith, for instance, may shape his personal motivations and values, which can be relevant in discussions about his character or actions. On the other hand, Floyd's criminal record often becomes a focal point in discussions surrounding incidents involving law enforcement and social issues, but it can detract from understanding the broader context of systemic issues and individual circumstances. The absence of these nuanced discussions could be due to various reasons, such as the focus of a particular narrative or the prioritization of specific aspects of their stories that resonate more with audiences. Ideally, a balanced view should incorporate all relevant factors to provide a more comprehensive understanding. If you have a specific context or media piece in mind, I can discuss how these elements might be represented or overlooked in that scenario.