MAKE THIS FLOW BETTER TOGETHER BUT KEEP EACH TOPIC SEPERATE - President Trump is trying to take the reins with an executive order aimed at restricting birthright citizenship only to those born here to actual citizens or legal permanent residents.  This is

President Trump is making headlines once again with an executive order that seeks to redefine birthright citizenship, limiting it to those born in the U.S. to actual citizens or legal permanent residents. This move is significant not only from a legal standpoint but also for its potential impact on our electoral landscape. Democrats, in particular, see this as an opportunity to manipulate the immigration system to enhance their voter base. One of the notable trends surrounding birthright citizenship involves Chinese nationals who are increasingly using this provision to secure U.S. citizenship for their children. Expert Peter Schweizer describes this as a phenomenon occurring on an "industrial scale." Such a trend raises pressing concerns about national security and the long-term consequences for American institutions. On "Jesse Watters Primetime" Wednesday, Schweizer elaborated on his findings, noting that around 12 to 13 years ago, the Chinese Communist Party began promoting the concept of American birthright citizenship through its official publications, encouraging affluent families to consider this avenue for securing U.S. citizenship for their children. This push has resulted in the emergence of a substantial industry, with over 1,000 Chinese companies now openly advertising services that assist wealthy clients in traveling to the U.S. to give birth—a process that can cost as much as $80,000. In the political arena, Democratic Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed has recently faced criticism for his comments equating the "radicalism" of Iran to the "MAGA movement." During an appearance on "America's Newsroom," El-Sayed addressed leaked audio revealing his reluctance to discuss the death of former Iranian leader Khamenei, citing concerns about community sensitivities. He went on to criticize U.S. foreign involvement, emphasizing its financial strains on taxpayers and the ongoing cycle of foreign conflicts. However, his ambiguous responses regarding Iran's political landscape have prompted critics to question his stance on crucial national security issues and terrorism.