im debating a guy in the comments on why europe will fall to islamic immigration and told him to stop infesting terrorism at first place that leads to them getting bombed to which he replies maybe stop engineering governments in the middle east...🤔 The bo

It sounds like the person you are debating is making a point about the historical context of political boundaries in the Middle East. They are referring to the Sykes-Picot Agreement, which was a secret agreement between the United Kingdom and France during World War I that laid the groundwork for the modern borders of several Middle Eastern countries. They are illustrating how these borders were drawn arbitrarily, often ignoring the ethnic, tribal, and religious complexities of the region. By using the analogy of China colonizing Europe and rearranging borders, they seem to be suggesting that imposing external political borders can lead to long-term instability and conflict, as it did in the Middle East. The argument implies that the challenges and conflicts we see in the region today, including issues related to terrorism and mass migration, can be traced back to these colonial decisions. In essence, he is questioning the notion that the problems stem solely from immigration or terrorism today, suggesting that historical interventions and the way modern states were constructed also play a significant role in the situation.