I made a post stating that the reward for a date is not coitus. Taking a girl on a date doesn’t mean that the girl has to go home with you… And a guy replied with this: If only the women we take out on dates won’t feel entitled to this dating thing….you

You could respond with something like: "I understand where you're coming from, and it's important for both parties to feel comfortable and respected in the dating process. However, dating can sometimes involve expectations that differ between people. Communication is key—if you clarify what you’re both looking for upfront, it may help alleviate any feelings of entitlement or pressure. Ultimately, it’s about finding a balance that works for both individuals." Update (2025-04-18): It's important to acknowledge the sentiments and experiences of both parties when discussing dating dynamics. It seems like the person you’re replying to feels that some women may have unrealistic expectations when it comes to dates, while you’re asserting that intimacy should not be assumed as a reward for dating. In terms of your response, you can address his concerns while maintaining your stance. Here’s a potential reply you might consider: "I understand where you're coming from, as it can feel frustrating when expectations are misaligned. However, I think it's essential to view dating as an opportunity for two people to connect and enjoy each other’s company. It’s not about entitlement but rather about mutual respect and understanding. Asking for things like hair, nails, or clothes might be excessive, but open communication about preferences and what both parties feel comfortable with is key. A date should be enjoyable for both individuals without assumptions about what one person owes the other. Ideally, it's about creating a fun time together, without pressure for anything more. What are your thoughts on open communication in setting expectations before a date?" This response encourages dialogue and shows that you respect his views while also reinforcing your own perspective on dating.