Explain why parliament alone should not be saddled with law making though it is its main core function

While parliament is fundamentally tasked with the law-making function, there are several reasons why it should not be solely responsible for this role. Here are some key points:

**Checks and Balances**: A diverse law-making process helps maintain checks and balances within the government. If parliament were the sole entity responsible for law-making, it might lead to an imbalance of power. Other branches of government, such as the executive and judiciary, play crucial roles in interpreting and enforcing laws, which can provide oversight and prevent potential abuses of power.

**Representation of Diverse Interests**: Law-making affects a broad spectrum of the population and various interest groups. Including other stakeholders, such as local governments, civil society organizations, and specialized committees, can provide a wider range of perspectives and expertise. This inclusiveness can lead to more comprehensive and effective legislation that better reflects the diverse needs of society.

**Expert Input and Consultation**: Many laws require specialized knowledge and expertise in areas like health, technology, and environmental policy. Involving experts and stakeholders in the law-making process can enhance the quality of legislation. Parliamentary committees, public consultations, and expert panels can provide valuable insights that parliamentarians may not possess.

**Public Engagement and Accountability**: Law-making is a public process, and involving citizens enhances democratic accountability. Mechanisms like referendums, public consultations, or petitions allow citizens to have a voice in the legislative process, leading to more accountable governance. When citizens are engaged, they are more likely to feel a sense of ownership and responsibility over the laws that govern them.

**Efficiency and Responsiveness**: In some cases, urgent issues may necessitate rapid legislative action that traditional parliamentary procedures cannot accommodate. Alternative law-making mechanisms, such as executive orders or emergency regulations, can allow for quick responses to crises without going through the lengthy legislative process.

**Avoiding Partisanship**: Parliament can sometimes become embroiled in partisan politics, which may hinder effective law-making. By involving other entities or mechanisms in the legislative process, there can be a greater chance of bipartisan cooperation and compromise, leading to more stable and widely accepted laws.

**Judicial Influence**: Courts play a critical role in interpreting laws and ensuring they comply with the constitution and fundamental rights. This judicial oversight can influence and improve the law-making process by ensuring that laws are not just effectively crafted but also just and equitable.

In summary, while parliament plays a crucial role in law-making, a collaborative approach that includes various stakeholders and mechanisms enhances the quality, fairness, and effectiveness of legislation. Multiplicity in law-making can lead to more democratically legitimate, informed, and adaptive laws, benefiting society as a whole.