Does Origenism's teaching on universal salvation disregard the primacy of free will?

Origenism, a theological system attributed to Origen of Alexandria, posits the idea of universal salvation, suggesting that ultimately all souls will be reconciled with God. This concept of universal salvation is often viewed through the lens of God's love and mercy, indicating that even those who fall away can be redeemed. The question of whether Origenism disregards the primacy of free will is a complex one. Origen himself emphasized the importance of free will, believing that human beings have the natural ability to choose between good and evil. He argued that the existence of free will is what allows for genuine love and relationship with God. However, critics of Origenism argue that the notion of universal salvation might undermine the significance of free will by suggesting that, regardless of the choices one makes in this life, all will ultimately be saved. This perspective could imply that individual decisions and moral responsibility are less significant in the grand scheme of salvation. Proponents of Origenism might counter that the universalist aspect does not negate free will but rather affirms it. They could argue that even though all may eventually be saved, the path to that salvation is still contingent upon individual choices and the acceptance of God's grace. In this view, the process of purification and reconciliation might involve a significant respect for human free will, as individuals must ultimately choose to align themselves with God. In summary, while some interpretations of Origenism's teaching on universal salvation might raise concerns about the role of free will, others maintain that free will remains central to Origen's theology, allowing for human agency in the journey toward salvation.