a. Explain why parliament alone should not be saddled with law making though it is its main core function

While Parliament is primarily responsible for lawmaking in a democratic system, there are several reasons why it should not be solely saddled with this function. Here are some key points to consider:

**Separation of Powers**: A fundamental principle of democratic governance is the separation of powers among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. Each branch plays a distinct role, and concentrating lawmaking solely in Parliament could undermine this balance. The executive branch, for instance, has the practical experience and implementation capabilities that can inform more effective legislation.

**Public Participation**: Lawmaking should involve a broader spectrum of society to ensure that diverse views and needs are taken into account. Engaging the public in the legislative process can lead to more representative and effective laws. Mechanisms such as referenda, public consultations, and input from civil society organizations can enhance the democratic quality of lawmaking.

**Expertise and Specialization**: Some aspects of lawmaking require specialized knowledge that may not be present within the general body of Parliament. Involving experts, think tanks, or committees that focus on specific issues (like health, technology, or the environment) can lead to more informed and effective legislation.

**Efficiency and Flexibility**: Legislative processes can be slow and cumbersome. In cases of urgent need (such as crises or emergencies), reliance solely on Parliament may hinder timely responses. Allowing the executive branch or regulatory agencies to issue temporary laws, regulations, or emergency measures can facilitate quick action when necessary.

**Checks and Balances**: Allowing other bodies, such as the judiciary and regulatory agencies, to play a role in lawmaking creates a system of checks and balances. This can help prevent the potential for abuse of power by ensuring that laws are subjected to scrutiny and review from multiple perspectives.

**Intended Outcomes and Evaluation**: Laws should not only be created but also evaluated for their effectiveness over time. Various stakeholders, including social organizations and community groups, should participate in assessing the impact of laws and proposing amendments or new legislation in response to societal changes.

**Political Dynamics**: Political considerations can affect lawmaking in Parliament, potentially leading to partial or biased legislation. Including a wider range of voices in the law-making process can help ensure that laws are created based on objective needs and democratic consensus rather than party politics.

In summary, while Parliament plays a crucial role in lawmaking, a more inclusive and collaborative approach can improve the quality, relevance, and effectiveness of laws in a democratic society. Allowing for participation from various stakeholders, including the executive branch, experts, and the public, can create a more balanced and efficient legislative process.