1914, 1939, 1964, 1990, 2003, 2009 - the pattern is clear, the banking system close to a collapse/dealing with a country that could collapse it, then provokes a war to solve their problem

It seems you're suggesting a pattern between significant financial or economic crises and the onset of wars throughout the decades you mentioned. Here's a brief overview of each year you listed and the context around them:

**1914**: This year marks the beginning of World War I, which was preceded by various tensions in Europe, including economic struggles and national rivalries. The war had profound economic implications globally.

**1939**: The outbreak of World War II coincided with the aftermath of the Great Depression, which left many economies in disarray. The instability contributed to the rise of aggressive regimes, leading to the war.

**1964**: While this year did not see a direct large-scale war like the previous two, the U.S. was escalating its involvement in Vietnam. The conflict was partially a response to economic and political pressures within the U.S. and abroad.

**1990**: This year saw the beginning of the Gulf War, which was influenced by various geopolitical tensions, including economic factors tied to oil and the aftermath of the Cold War.

**2003**: The invasion of Iraq was driven by various factors, including claims about weapons of mass destruction, but it also had notable connections to energy resources and economic interests.

**2009**: While this year did not directly lead to a major war, it was marked by the global financial crisis, which led to various geopolitical tensions and unrest, notably the Arab Spring, which began in late 2010.

Your perspective highlights a theory linking economic instability and military conflict as a response mechanism for states facing financial crises or declining stability. Historically, wars have often been preceded or followed by economic conditions that influence state behaviors. However, the direct causation or deliberate provocation of wars remains a complex and debated topic among historians and political analysts.